Product
From match to proposal, in one place.
Find, score, shred, evaluate, price, draft, and win. From the moment an opportunity hits SAM.gov through a pink-team proposal you can defend, line by line.
01 · Feed
Scored feed
Every SAM.gov notice ranked against your capability statement, NAICS, past performance, and set-aside eligibility. Best fit first, every morning.
- Ranked 0–100 with PURSUE / REVIEW / PASS verdict
- Filter by verdict, NAICS, agency, set-aside
- Every score cites the requirement it's based on
- 92PURSUEIT Modernization — DHS S&T541512 · SB · Due 21d
- 88PURSUECyber Advisory — Army CCoE541512 · Unrestricted · Due 14d
- 74REVIEWCloud Migration — VA OI&T541519 · SDVOSB · Due 30d
- 61REVIEWData Analytics IDIQ — USDA541511 · 8(a) · Due 45d
- 41PASSFacility Ops — GSA R7561210 · Unrestricted · Due 12d
02 · Workspace
Opportunity workspace
One page per opportunity. Match score, verdict, deadline, and every workflow tab you need — no more juggling five browser tabs and a spreadsheet.
- Header centered on 'The Decision'
- Tabs for Shred, Evaluate, Compliance, Capture, Draft, Documents
- Artifact history for every regenerated brief
03 · Shred
RFP shred
Break any solicitation — SAM notice, prime subcontract, state RFP, or sole-source package — into a structured summary, requirements, and red flags in seconds.
- Sectioned summary and scope
- Every 'shall' extracted as a tracked requirement
- Red flags surfaced with the passage they came from
FFP task order for cybersecurity advisory services supporting Army CCoE. 12-month base, four option years. On-site presence at Ft. Gordon 3 days/week.
- L.4 · Corporate experience — 3 relevant PoP
- L.5.2 · Key personnel with active TS/SCI
- M.2 · Technical approach, 15 pages max
- H.7 · SCA compliance if wage-determined
04 · Brief
Bid / no-bid brief
A cited, defensible go/no-go call in minutes. See recommendation, win probability, and strengths and gaps mapped to the sections that drove them.
- LEAN BID / NO BID / LEAN NO recommendation
- Win probability with reasoning
- Strengths and gaps mapped to L / M sections
05 · Compliance
Compliance matrix
Every requirement tracked, categorized, and cross-walked to where you'll address it. Nothing gets tossed on a technicality.
- Ref, requirement, type, and where addressed
- Filter by section, category, or status
- Export to whatever proposal shell you use
| Ref | Requirement | Type | Where addressed |
|---|---|---|---|
| L.4 | 3 relevant PoP within 5 yrs | Experience | Vol I · §2 |
| L.5.2 | Key personnel TS/SCI | Personnel | Vol I · §4 |
| M.2 | Technical approach ≤15 pgs | Technical | Vol II · all |
| H.7 | SCA wage compliance | Compliance | Vol III · §1 |
06 · Structure
Section L/M alignment
A proposal outline structured to Section L instructions and cross-walked to Section M evaluation factors and weights. Structure to L, write to M.
- Outline mirrors L instructions section by section
- Every section mapped to the M factor it will be scored on
- Factor weights surfaced so effort follows the points
07 · Past performance
Past-performance match
Ranks your past projects by relevance to the opportunity and tells you exactly how to position each one in the proposal.
- Relevance ranking with cited justification
- Positioning guidance per project
- Gap flags when no strong PP exists
- 94StrongArmy CCoE Cyber Advisory · FY24Lead with — same customer, same scope, active PoP.
- 78FitDHS S&T Zero-Trust Assessment · FY23Support cite — proves methodology at similar scale.
- 52WeakVA OI&T Cloud Migration · FY22Skip — different customer, weaker fit to L.4 criteria.
08 · Pricing
Pricing & LCAT intelligence
Extract labor categories and CLINs from the solicitation, map them to your roles, and pressure-test option-year escalation before you're locked into a fixed price for five years.
- LCATs and CLINs extracted and mapped to your roles
- Option-year escalation and price defensibility flags
- Contract-type awareness (FFP, T&M, Cost-plus)
| LCAT | Maps to | CLIN | Loaded |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr. Cyber Architect | → Sr. Security Engineer | 0001 | $212 |
| Zero-Trust SME | → Principal Consultant | 0001 | $248 |
| Cyber Analyst II | → Security Analyst | 0002 | $142 |
| PM III | → Delivery Lead | 0003 | $186 |
09 · Competition
Competitor & incumbent intel
Uses public federal award data from USAspending.gov to surface likely incumbents and frequent winners on similar work — with positioning advice, not just names.
- Likely-incumbent detection from prior awards
- Frequent-winner patterns across the customer
- Positioning notes: displace, team, or avoid
Sourced from public federal award records. Signals — not guarantees.
10 · Capture
Capture plan builder
Win themes, teaming targets, and action items — tailored to your shop and the opportunity, not a generic template.
- Discriminators and win themes
- Prioritized action items with owners
- Teaming and pricing intelligence prompts
- P0Identify TS/SCI-cleared key personnel candidate
- P1Draft teaming outreach to prime for L.4 coverage
- P2Confirm SCA wage determinations for Ft. Gordon
11 · Draft
AI proposal drafting
The crown jewel. Section by section, grounded in your capability statement, past performance, and the RFP's own shred. Structured to Section L, written to Section M, cited, and honest — it refuses to fabricate and marks placeholders you have to fill.
- Pink-team draft in minutes, not days
- Cited to your library and the solicitation
- Refuses to invent — amber placeholders for gaps
Our approach delivers CCoE's Zero-Trust roadmap through a three-phase engagement — assess, architect, and operationalize — anchored by our cleared cyber bench and prior work on the Army's identity modernization program…
- · cap-statement.pdf §Cyber Advisory
- · PP: Army CCoE FY24 (94% relevance)
- · Shred: L.3.1, M.2, H.7
- · [KEY PERSON — TS/SCI cleared architect name]
- · [FTE COUNT — Phase 2 architect surge]
12 · Library
Content library that writes with you
Save your best answers once — management approach, QA plan, past performance, staffing — and every draft reuses your approved language. The AI recommends which saved entries fit each RFP and suggests new ones to capture from every win.
- Reusable entries by category, tagged and cited
- Recommended matches surfaced per opportunity
- Suggests new entries to save from your wins
- ManagementRecommended for this RFPProgram management approach14drafts
- QualityRecommended for this RFPQA/QC plan — ISO 9001 aligned9drafts
- Past performanceArmy CCoE Cyber Advisory — FY2411drafts
- StaffingKey personnel retention approach6drafts
13 · Verify
Deterministic compliance verification
AI finds the requirements. Deterministic code verifies coverage. Same inputs, same result, every single time — so you can't get tossed on a technicality nobody caught. This is the trust layer generative AI alone can't give you.
- Rules-based coverage check — 100% repeatable
- Gate status: PASS / WARN / FAIL with the missing refs
- Unacknowledged amendments surfaced before submit
Same inputs always produce the same result. AI finds the requirements; deterministic code verifies coverage — so "good enough" becomes verified.
14 · Red team
Red-team review
Scores your draft the way a government source-selection evaluator would against Section M. Tells you exactly where you'd lose points — with the fix — before you submit.
- Blue / green / yellow / red rating with a score
- Weaknesses tied to the M factor they'd hit
- A concrete fix for each — not just criticism
Reads as competent but doesn't put the discriminators where an evaluator will find them under time pressure. Two fixes lift this to Green.
- Discriminator buried in paragraph 3mediumAffects → M.2 Technical meritFix · Lead §3.1 with the cleared-bench claim; move context after.
- No quantified staffing surge for Phase 2highAffects → M.3 ManagementFix · Add named FTE count + ramp timeline table before §4.3.
15 · Export
Word + Excel export
Export the proposal to Word (.docx) and the compliance matrix to Excel (.xlsx) — the formats you actually submit in. No copy-paste, no reformatting.
- Proposal → Word, cover page and volumes intact
- Compliance matrix → Excel, ready to hand the PM
- One click from the workspace header
The formats your PM and contracts officer actually open.
16 · Consistency
Cross-volume consistency check
Reads across every drafted section and flags the contradictions that get proposals dinged — mismatched staffing counts, agency names typed three ways, claims made in one volume but missed in another.
- Consistency score across all drafted volumes
- Contradictions surfaced with where they conflict
- Severity-ranked so critical fixes come first
- Staffing mismatchcriticalVol I §4.2 ↔ Vol III Price §212 FTEs described in staffing plan · 9 FTEs priced in Year 1.
- Agency namingmediumVol I cover ↔ Vol II §1'Army CCoE' vs 'Army Cyber Center of Excellence' — pick one.
- Missing claimmediumVol II §3.1 → Vol I §2Technical volume cites CMMC L2; exec summary omits it.
17 · Amendments
Amendment tracking
The moment you move a bid to pursuit, we watch it. Every amendment, page-limit change, and deadline shift shows up as an alert — never blindsided.
- Auto-watch on pursued opportunities
- Severity-ranked alerts (page limits, deadlines, requirements)
- One-click acknowledge to keep the log clean
18 · Risk
Non-responsive risk scan
A pre-submission checklist that catches the preventable disqualifiers — unacknowledged amendments, expiring SAM registration, missing certs, page limits. Don't get tossed on a technicality.
- Overall risk level with prioritized flags
- Each item cites the requirement or record it came from
- Verify or acknowledge to clear before submit
- flagAmendment 002 not acknowledgedBlocks submit — acknowledge in workspace
- verifySAM registration expires before awardRenew before 2026-08-01
- verifyCMMC L2 cert on file — confirm still validM.4 Past performance cites CMMC
- okPage count under L.3 limit (24/25)1 page of headroom
19 · Early signals
Pre-solicitation intel
Sources-sought and pre-solicitation notices worth acting on — surfaced early with fit reasoning so you can shape the RFP before it drops.
- Ranked by fit against your capability statement
- Response guidance for sources-sought replies
- Move a signal into your pipeline when the RFP drops
- StrongSources Sought — DHA Cyber Advisory Support541512 · Response due 12d · Posted 2d ago
- StrongPre-Sol — Army CCoE FY27 Follow-on541512 · RFP est. Q1 · Incumbent-adjacent
- FitRFI — VA Zero Trust Program Mgmt541519 · Response due 18d · New requirement
20 · Pipeline
Pipeline
A Kanban view of every opportunity you're pursuing, from Identified through Won. Click any card to drop back into the workspace.
- Stages: Identified → Qualifying → Bidding → Submitted → Won / Lost
- Filter by verdict, agency, deadline
- Win/loss debriefs feed back into your scoring on Team
21 · Vehicles · Team
Contract vehicle tracking
Track your GSA Schedules, GWACs, IDIQs, and BPAs in one place. Option-period and expiration alerts fire early enough that no renewal ever sneaks up on you.
- GSA Schedules, GWACs, IDIQs, BPAs in one library
- Option-period and expiration alerts (180d amber, 90d red)
- Team tier — shared across seats
Tell the AI how you actually evaluate.
Every shop has its own rules — the geographies you'll travel to, the contract types you refuse, the primes you already team with, the minimum ceiling you'll chase. Add your preferences and dealbreakers once, and every match score, brief, and capture plan reflects them.
Run the whole workflow this week.
7 days free. No credit card charged until you decide to keep going.